CTYPE Suggestion

  • velsuki
    28th September Member 0 Permalink

    you would need to make.... 38,000 element pairs.

  • pacmanfan123
    28th September Member 0 Permalink

    @velsuki (View Post)

     Aren't we glad I changed the suggestion? :)

  • Aklego-777
    28th September Member 0 Permalink

    @pacmanfan123 (View Post)

     To be fair, I guess PRTI and PRTO with ctype X allowing only particle X in and out kind of makes sense but uhh.. depends on how many uses it can be used on. 

  • AerospaceFan
    28th September Member 0 Permalink

    fir the stuff like SAND(BCOL) maybe one could average out the properties like Flammable or Weight, and for stuff like elem.PROP_CONDUCTS you could make it so theres 50% or smth that its transferree from both the elements to the ctyped elements, doesnt make sense probably but nvm

  • pacmanfan123
    28th September Member 0 Permalink

    @Aklego-777 (View Post)

     It could take part in a machinery; all you need to do is fill in the blanks to get more ideas.

  • Tadpole1
    2:03:51 Member 0 Permalink

    you can always use stor+pipe+potral but it solves the pressure problem so +1