FP has always been bad, what're you talking about. also, i like it, it's conv without the conv +1
@dirtguy11211: The quality and effort in FP has just gone strait down in recent weeks, and the people of tpt don't even realize it.
@DRZOIDBERG Why do you hate this so much :crying:
its just a loop of cray, nothing incredible is happening here
ok???? it still replaces the original.
this fits no actual definition of converting, the particles seen each time are compleatly diffrent particles then what was there previously. This can be seen by the fact that the particle numbers change, proving that the new particles are actually compleatly new unrealated particles, rather than a transformation of the previous particles